Deluge of Atlantis

Deluge of Atlantis
Deluge of Atlantis

Saturday, March 8, 2014

Tiahuanacu a New Proposition

At Tiahuanaco you get several scattered C14 dates and what look to be several different styles of ruins. At one level there is an old culture along the lins of Egypt and Babylon, with an associated tradition of erecting standing stones. At some time this was destroyed and a more Roman type civilization took over. When this was deposed and the Barbarians were in occupation was when the "Tiahuanaco Empire" was in evidence, about in the European Dark Ages or about contemporary with the Maya. It is then that the "Decadent Tiahuanaco" culture was spread.
let's look at what some have artistically created what Puma Punku/Tiwanaku could have possibly looked like when it wasn't broken, buried and scattered. 

The truth of the matter is that we don't know what the site looks like. It appears to have been destroyed in some great upheaval in ancient times. Then later the Incas, Spanish and some in much more recent times have scavenged building blocks to use in homes and churches etc.
[On to more about deformed heads ]

The area around Tiwanaku may have been inhabited as early as 1500 BC as a small agricultural village.[5] Most research has studied the Tiwanaku IV and V periods between AD 300 and AD 1000, during which the polity grew significantly in power. During the time period between 300 BC and AD 300, Tiwanaku is thought to have been a moral and cosmological center to which many people made pilgrimages. Researchers believe it achieved this standing prior to expanding its powerful empire.[1] In 1945, Arthur Posnansky[6] estimated that Tiwanaku dated to 15,000 BC, based on his archaeoastronomical techniques. In the 21st century, experts decisively concluded Posnansky's dates were invalid and a "sorry example of misused archaeoastronomical evidence."[7]
  1. Jump up5. ^ Fagan, Brian M. The Seventy Great Mysteries of the Ancient World: Unlocking the Secrets of Past Civilizations. New York: Thames & Hudson, 2001.
  2. Jump up6. ^ Posnansky, A. (1945), Tihuanacu, the Cradle of American Man, Vols. I - II (Translated into English by James F. Sheaver), J. J. Augustin, Publ., New York, 1945; Vols. III - IV, La Paz, Bolivia: Minister of Education
  3. Jump up7. ^ Kelley, D. H., and E. F. Milone (2002) Exploring Ancient Skies: An Encyclopedic Survey of Archaeoastronomy, New York: Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., 616 pp.

Actually just after 1500 BC would have been the END of the earlier culture and the end of the local Megalithic age, about contemporary with the end of Megalithic Europe. Since this about coincides with Velikovsky, there is a pretty good possibility that the Andean Sea catastrophe was at that time, the andes were raised and the sea drained out, and this would NOT have had anything to do with the Younger Dryas age because the area would have be locked in ice then (The Inner Andean sea could well have formed in the postglacial along with the deglaciation)

 Internally it is possible that there was a settlement in 15000 to 9000 BC which could have left the Archaeoastronomical stone ALIGNMENTS which were incorporated by later cultures (I use this same argument in the case of ancient Egypt). This would be in the period contemporary with Toxodons and Macrauchenia. And you can see some evidence in the layout of the site itself:

Immediately it can be seen that the more famous and better preserved structures at the site have an East-West orientation while the Akpana Pyramid is skewed relative to them. This is actually very significant.

The Main structures at Tianhuanaco align with the true north and with the modrn East and West references. This is to align properly with the sun. They were thus obviously all built in the postglacial period although many show signs of recycling older stones from previously built and previously destroyed structures.

The Akpana pyramid is skewed relative to the rest and it has been suggested that it aligns to a Pleistocene Ice-age position of the North Pole. It is also a very peculiar structure and it is reminiscent of Gunung Padang, a pyramid in Java that is thought to have been built in the last stags of the last Ice Age, starting from between 10000 and 20000 years ago. Which would make sense as an earliest date for Tiahuanaco now (using only the Akpana Pyramid now and not the Gate of the Sun or any of the more usually represented structures.

 And in fact the Gunung Padang site in its current run-down status resembles some of the more disarrayed parts of Tiahuanaco with megalithic stones lying all over the place and piled on top of one another.

So it looks to me as if we have a direct trans-pacific late-Pleistocene "Lemurian" connection which is evidenced by the pyramids in both  Gunung Padang and Tiahuanaco.

But after that in the usual times of the Old World Pyramid builders, there is a successive survivor culture at Tiahuanaco which is destroyed by catastrophic upheavals at about the point Velikovsky said there were cataclysms, or possibly at the same time as the Phaethon incident from the European perspective, the end of the Megalithic age. And that would be when Tiahuanaco was smashed and in ruins. Later on, about the time of the European Dark Ages, the usually-recognised Tiahuanaco culture arose, but aside from recycling some of the older stones (and their Ice-Age Astronomical markers) there was no connection between the later culture and the Ice Age one. But it does seem that any remains that are actually sunk in Lake Titicaca would belong to the older, Egyptian and Babylonian contemporary culture.

That would account for it!

No comments:

Post a Comment

This blog does NOT allow anonymous comments. All comments are moderated to filter out abusive and vulgar language and any posts indulging in abusive and insulting language shall be deleted without any further discussion.