Deluge of Atlantis

Deluge of Atlantis
Deluge of Atlantis

Saturday, December 14, 2013

The Neanderthaloid 'Loess Men' of Nebraska


 
 
This is one of the examples of an American Neanderthal that has actually
 gotten some notice and notoriety in the literature


I have seen this reference to skull 8 before, it is not an especially primitive example and others are much more extreme. It is however probably some sort of a halfbreed to something which is more extremely flat-headed. Incidentally the rounded back and bottom are some of the more Mongoloid traits. The other skulls at this site show lesser degrees of interbreeding.
 
Skull 8 is also similar to some Australian Aboriginal skulls, and some very old skulls found in China
 
 
 

Two views of the more robust and primitive-looking skull 8 from this Loess-age Nebraskan site

 
I superimposed the top skull over the bottom one and the one on top does look as if it diverges significantly into the Neanderthal direction. Its probably also significant that the skeleton was very tall and also strong and robust, the combination of all of these factors at one is unusual
 
 
The closest skull (Cranium) to this I can find in my Reference books is oe of the Neanderthal-Aged Omo skulls from Ethiopia. Therewere two skulls found at the same time at Omo,one a cruder and rougher individual (the one that looks like this one on top) and a more progressive individual with a rounder and fuller cranium
 
 
Its still not exactly a Neanderthal but it does incline very strongly in that direction.
 the Shanidar-Neanderthal skull photo is attached for comparison
 
And here is the second direct comparison, overlaying the cranium of skull 8 on the Neanderthal.
 The brow ridges and similarity of the eye sockets in shape and position
 between the two actually are impressively similar


The key diagnostic features showing this is a type of modern human being and
 NOT actually a Neanderthal have to do with the base and the back parts of the cranium. 

 

Barbour, Erwin Hinckley,

 "EVIDENCE OF MAN IN THE LOESS OF NEBRASKA" (1907).

 Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric
Sciences. Paper 355.
SPECIAL ARTICLES
EVIDENCE OF MAN IN THE LOESS OF NEBRASKA

AFTER careful investigation the writer stands ready to announce his belief in the occurrence of human remains in the loess of this state, and for this primitive type he has proposed the name Nebraska loess man.
Such importance attaches to the discovery as to warrant a paper devoted to the geological facts connected therewith.

Physiographic Features.-North of Omaha for a number of miles the topographic features are bold and abrupt for a prairie country due to the proximity of the Missouri River, the relief being 150 to 200 feet.
On all sides landslides are in evidence and must be reckoned with in all field work. Early in October Mr. Robert F. Gilder, of Omaha, opened a mound on Long's hill facing the Missouri River, ten miles north of Omaha or three miles north of Florence, Douglass County, Nebraska. From Florence north to Long's hill there is a continuous section along the roadside for about three miles and from the base of Long's hill to the summit, on which Gilder's mound is situated, there is an unbroken section, hence the geology of the place is well exposed, and being simple is easily interpreted. The public highway, which is about forty feet above the river level, is just upon the top of the Carboniferous, the dark carbonaceous shales of which constitute a distinct geological feature. Upon the shales there rests an average of ten to twenty feet of glacial drift containing occasional Sioux quartzite and granitic boulders. Upon the drift comes 150 feet of bright buff loess such as is conspicuous in and around Omaha and Council Bluffs.

Long's hill stands 200 feet above the river level, and 150 feet above the valley out of which it rises. It is a hill of erosion, and no discoverable land slip has complicated its simple geology. On its summit is Gilder's mound, in the superficial layer of which were found mound-builder remains, and in the deeper layer eight skulls and many bones of a still more primitive type. The writer at once joined Mr. Gilder in a critical investigation of the place, continuing the work from time to time to December 2, 1906, with results leading to the conclusion that two of the skulls are mound builders', in all probability. These were found in the upper layer readily discernible as a mixture of black soil and light buff subsoil such as would result from digging and burying. This layer has a thickness of two and one half feet. Below it was an undisturbed layer of unmistakable loess, and in it numberless fragments of human bones and an occasional animal bone, loess shells and stray angular pebbles. In brief, the conclusion is that in the case of the upper bone layer there was burial, in the- lower, deposition. Those in the loess doubtless antedate the hill itself while those in the upper layer are subsequent to it. That archaic burial could have taken place in loess without detection is altogether improbable. Of necessity there would result a mixture of black with light soil and a breaking up of the lithologic structure. Where these bones occur the loess structure and color is perfectly preserved and it contains characteristic vertical lime-tubes, concretions and shells precisely as is customary. Out of the evidence at hand the writer concludes that bones of this layer were strictly synchronous with the loess formation in which they were found, in substantiation of which comes the fragmental nature of all of the bones, their water-worn condition, their range of distribution, and disassociation of parts.

One would scarcely think of such conditions being possible in the case of human burial; besides it is improbable that a primitive people would dig graves to a depth of twelve feet. Should a people without tools and appliances perform such an improbable feat, would they bury water-worn fragments, would they scatter them so widely as not to exceed five or six pieces to the cubic yard? How could they replace the earth in the grave in such order and regularity that there would be perfect structure and gradation of color from soil to subsoil?

Methods of Exploration.-Early in November the writer recognized that the bones in the loess were apparently fossil, and great care was exercised in all subsequent work. On extendinlg the cross trenches which Mr. Gilder had dug, human bones scattered, water-worn, fragmentary and unrelated were found in natural undisturbed loess at all levels down to six feet. The most interesting single bit found on this occasion was the left half of a frontal bone secured at a depth of four to five feet. Later at a distance of five feet the other half was dug up, and the two parts fit together, completing an interesting low-browed frontal. A jaw, which was found in undisturbed loess at a depth of four feet, was that of a youth. The crowns of the teeth were scarcely worn, so old age can not be assigned as the reason for the absence of all teeth save molars Nos. 2 and 3 in the right ramus and No. 2 in the left. Just as the teeth of any water-soaked jaw drop out readily, so it seems to have been with this one. The inference is that they were lost in the process of deposition. A week later work was resumed, the writer being accompanied by Mr. Robert F. Gilder and Dr. George E. Condra, and the attempt was made to be severely critical and careful.

All surface material was carefully removed and three wide shafts were sunk on the northern, eastern, and southern points of the mound. Each shovelful of earth was scrutinized, all bone fragments carefully saved and recorded. In all some twenty bits were found, as follows: a fragment from the base of a skull, fragments of ribs, limb bones, scapula and sacrum; a clavicle, calcaneum, three complete vertebroet, wo metapodes and a phalanx. Some of the bits mentioned were but slivers, other bits were two or three inches long. Some were badly etched by water, others gnawed by rodents. As each fragment was unearthed a block of the matrix was kept and as far as possible each fragment was preserved in position in the block.

There were but twenty fragments in this lot, for while it is true that the shafts were sunk to a depth of eight feet, and while bone chips were found at all levels, they were widely scattered and few in number. Among the fragments may be mentioned five or six bits of skull, as many bits of rib, the angle of a jaw, metatarsal No. 3, and two phalanges, and with them bits of Anadonta, Succinea avara, and several angular pebbles. When work was resumed a few days later a circle thirty feet in diameter was described concentrically about the mound, which is about eighteen feet in diameter. The northeast quadrant of the circle was divided into sectors of twenty-two and a half degrees and lettered. This quadrant as a whole was excavated to an average depth of six feet its periphery to an average depth of eight to nine feet, and a shaft was sunk to a depth of twelve feet on the north edge.

The writer was accompanied and aided by Dr. George E. Condra, Edwin Davis, Paul Butler, and as time would permit by Mr. Gilder. Systematic work was continued for three consecutive days. Fragments of human bones, scattered and unrelated, were found throughout the quadrant at all levels even to the depth of eleven and one half feet. It was plainly demonstrated that the part without the circle of the mound was quite as rich in bone fragments as that within. The relation of the two sets of bones may be viewed as purely accidental. In but a single instance were several bones found together. Three ribs, fragments of limb bones, and an astragalas were in proximity. Probably two hundred fragments were exhumed on this occasion. It should be noted that no whole bones were found excepting a few phalanges. Instead they are bone-chips and splinters, with an occasional section from a limb bone, and many of the fragments are pitted or etched. Out of this set the following fragments seem of especial interest: half of a jaw with a solitary molar, the condyle, angle, and region of the symphysis being weathered off, fragmentary rami of two other unrelated jaws, the bony palate with the two back molars in place. By far the most interesting and instructive specimen found at this time was a skull completely disarticulate, broken, and scattered over a space five by five feet. This was taken out in blocks, and no attempt will be made to remove the bits from their original position, the intention being to keep everything in such condition as to facilitate the detection of inaccuracies and errors. Age of the Supposed Loess Man.-The present paper concerns itself simply with the announcement of human remains found in undisturbed loess. The chief point is the evidence that human remains have been found in the loess, and whether this is the very oldest or newest loess seems a secondary consideration. The loess here is not leached of lime salts, but is actively effervescent at all levels, arguing for recency of deposition. All recognize the chronological diversity in the loess formation, and whether Long's hill is in the main loess body, as we believe it to be, or in a much more recent one does not materially affect the relation of the bones to some stage of glaciation, the precise glacial or interglacial age being as yet undetermined. The loess in question rests on Kansan drift, and though as young as the later Wisconsin sheet or younger, it is nevertheless old.

ERWIN HINCKLEY BARBOUR
THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA,
December 14, 1906
Reprinting
'Nebraska Geological Survey, Vol. II., parts 5 and 6'.
 
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geosciencefacpub/355

Critical Respoonse by Ales Hrdlicka

No comments:

Post a Comment

This blog does NOT allow anonymous comments. All comments are moderated to filter out abusive and vulgar language and any posts indulging in abusive and insulting language shall be deleted without any further discussion.