[ie, of the Glacial Recession age or Younger?]
This favors high returns in Africa there are less than 100,000 years are to be in connection with another theory, theory that Homo sapiens African would they too (like the Homo sapiens with Eurasian Neanderthal) crossbred with archaic human lineage has recently in Africa. This is at least suggest that some genetic studies.  Better still this archaic human lineage have been present in Africa 13,000 years only there as indicate the recent discovery in Nigeria a skull appearing possess characteristics of archaic human lineages!  [Compare to the so-called "Eyasi Man"-DD]
Thus, according to this theory, Homo sapiens African would also intermarried with archaic hominids disappeared today and even better representatives of this archaic tradition had survived until there very recently in Africa. But even if, as already mentioned above a skull 13,000 years discovered in Nigeria has been interpreted as belonging to a possible representative of this hypothetical archaic hominid lineage, nothing is less certain! Because, as Maju has well reminded us [Below] it has always been a significant morphological variability within populations of Homo sapiens . Maju thus having given good reasons to doubt the idea that the skull found in Nigeria is that of a representative of an archaic tradition has now disappeared. Indeed images support it shows that there are other bones of modern humans with a cranial vault similar to the specimen Nigeria and this without the status of "Modern Men" individuals with such cranial vaults, is questioned!
Claims of Nigerian late "archaic" human… highly dubious
|Inner drawing: Iwo Eleru, outer drawing: modern mean|
[Which to my eye DEFINITELY places it in the Neanderthaloid category-DD]